Matt - Engineering
Matt reviews PRs from Montreal. His team is in Paris.
Every review needs context that isn’t in the Jira ticket. Why the dev made this decision. Why the acceptance criteria reads the way it does. What the PO had in mind. What was tried and ruled out. What the tradeoffs were.
Daily standups give him 60 seconds of vague summary, not the real reasoning. Most devs already push back on standups: 15 minutes that interrupt focus, shared context that stays surface-level. The intent is right. The format isn’t. Documentation is partial. Recorded meetings let him watch but not ask. A question at 2 PM Montreal waits 18 hours for an answer from Paris. By the time the answer comes back, the question has shifted.
Agile was supposed to fix this. A rushed 15-minute standup where everyone speaks vaguely isn’t depth. The actual reasoning, the decisions, the tradeoffs, the things that make a review meaningful, live in people’s heads and in scattered threads across Slack, Jira, GitHub, and email.
Reaching it requires reaching the person. Who is in another meeting. Or in another timezone. Or asleep. Or out sick. Or on vacation. Or just heads-down on something else that needed them more.


